John and Teresa bought Blueacre Essay Example

John and Teresa bought Blueacre Essay John and Teresa bought Blueacre. They are hence regarded as co-owners of the belongings. There are two chief signifiers of co-ownership. John and Teresa can keep the belongings either as joint renters or renters in common. Differentiation separates between the two types of co-ownership. One differentiation is the mode of creative activity and the 2nd is that joint occupancy is recognised as jurisprudence while occupancy in common operates in equity. A 3rd differentiation respects degeneration of belongings on decease of either Teresa or toilet. Joint occupancy simplicities estate dealing because figure owner of estate lessenings on decease. It is a signifier of ownership that jurisprudence favor. Occupancy in common on the other manus obtains favour in equity. The figure of estate owner addition on decease. Personal representatives of asleep renter are entitled to the deceased portion. In joint occupancy, renters hold the legal involvement in the estate jointly. On death of one of the renters, the lasting renter will automatically take the portion of the asleep renter. This is one of the exclusions of degeneration of estate without demand of a will. Thus, joint occupancy can non be severed by a will. Solicitors outlining a will must guarantee that the gift of belongings can go through under the will. The canvasser must break up joint occupancy before put to deathing the will. Failure of gift due to skip of the canvasser makes him apt in carelessness [ 1 ] . We will write a custom essay sample on John and Teresa bought Blueacre specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on John and Teresa bought Blueacre specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on John and Teresa bought Blueacre specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer On the other manus, occupancy in common operates in equity and oblige a trust of belongings in favor of other renters keeping good involvement in belongings. Interest of deceased renter in the belongings will go through to his personal representatives. A differentiation in formation of joint renter and a renter in common will be conducted. A joint occupancy can be created where there is nil incompatible with its creative activity. Basically, there must be nil in renters act and behavior to propose that they intend to keep distinguishable involvement from each other. Besides, the undermentioned integrities must be applicable to obtaining rubric: Time: The involvement of the co-owners must enthrone at the same clip. Therefore, where two people obtain the same belongings at the same clip, there will be said to be integrity of clip. Basically, John and Teresa in this instance look to hold acquired involvement in Blueacre at the same clip. Title: Where the co-owners obtained rubric by the same agencies and by virtuousness of the same papers there will be unity if rubric. The co-owners must hold acquired their rubric by virtuousness of the same mode of geting ownership [ 2 ] . In this instance, it appears that rubric in Blueacre was transferred to Teresa and John by virtuousness of the same papers. Interest: Another component of joint occupancy is that the co-owners must hold indistinguishable involvement in the belongings. In this instance, Teresa and John involvement in Blueacre is indistinguishable. They can both separately exercising claim and control to the whole of the belongings. It is difficult to see any difference in the rubric held by either of them. Possession: Co-owners must hold equal right to ownership of the full belongings without any disaffection of portion of the belongings entirely to the sole ownership of any of the co-owners. Joint renters enjoy ownership of the whole belongings together [ 3 ] . The regulations sing creative activity of joint occupancy are rigorous. It must follow with the four unites explained above and there must non be any act inconsistent with creative activity a joint occupancy. Any act either by words or actions which tend to set up separate involvement to belongings will contradict the decision that a joint occupancy is created. The tribunals held the undermentioned words to contradict the creative activity of a joint occupancy [ 4 ] . Between’ [ 5 ] , to divide between’ [ 6 ] , share and portion alike’ [ 7 ] , equally’ [ 8 ] . Occupancy in common is preserved by the subdivision 36 ( 2 ) Law of Property Act 1925. This provides that no rupture of a joint occupancy of a legal estate, so as to make a occupancy in common in land, shall be allowable, whether by operation of jurisprudence or otherwise, but this subdivision does non impact the right of a joint renter to let go of his involvement to the other joint renters, or the right to break up a joint occupancy in an just involvement whether or non the legal estate is vested in the joint renters: Provided that, where a legal estate ( non being settled land ) is vested in joint renters beneficially, and any renter desires to break up the joint occupancy in equity, he shall give to the other joint renters a notice in composing of such desire or make such other Acts of the Apostless or things as would, in the instance of personal estate, have been effective to break up the occupancy in equity, †¦.. The consequence of this subdivision is that although it is non allowable to break up legal articulation renter, it is still possible for the just occupancy in common to run. The subdivision besides introduced serverance by manner if notice. Finally, the subdivision continue the earlier method of rupture of joint occupancy. As opposed to joint occupancy, occupancy in common is non every bit perfect as joint occupancy and all that is required is merely the integrity of ownership of the belongings. Therefore, there is no demand that the other integrities be present in a occupancy in common. Besides, when the four integrities are present as in joint occupancy, it may still represent a occupancy in common where there is clear purpose by the renters to handle their involvement in the belongings as separate. Furthermore, where the renters make unequal parts towards the purchase of the belongings, there is a rebuttable given that the parties intend to make occupancy in common. Besides, where the belongings is a commercial belongings, the right of survivorship will be unequal in commercial investing in belongings. However, the four integrities are present in Teresa and John’s ownership of Blueacre . They both obtained and exercised ownership to the whole belongings. They both enjoyed indistinguishable involvement to the belongings. They both acquired involvement to the belongings at the same clip and eventually, they acquired their rubric to the belongings by the same means. Finally, there is nil incompatible with creative activity of a joint occupancy in their instance. Therefore, their ownership of Blueacre will be as joint renters. The temperament by Teresa’s will of her involvement in Blueacre to the kids has no consequence. This is because John has right of subsister in the estate and joint occupancy can non be severed by a will. The right to survivorship is a legal devise towards easing temperament of estate. Rupture of joint occupancy must be in conformity to jurisprudence. There are assorted methods of break uping a joint occupancy. The simplest method is by notice created by subdivision 36 ( 2 ) LPA 1925. The notice where sent by station, must be registered and served. For service to be effectual, it must be posted to the aforementioned topographic point of residence or concern, office, or counting-house, and if that missive is non returned undelivered ; and that service shall be deemed to be made at the clip at which the registered missive would in the ordinary class be delivered. [ 9 ] The tribunal inWilliams V. Hensman[ 10 ] identified three methods of break uping a joint occupancy. These are: Act of anyone of the individuals interested runing upon his ain portion. InFirst National Securities V. Hegarty[ 11 ] , the hubby purported to mortgage the belongings by hammering the signature of his married woman. The tribunal treated this as break uping the joint occupancy and the mortgage operated as a charge on the husband’s involvement in the belongings. Common understanding. Joint occupancy can be severed by understanding. This understanding may be expressed or implied from the behavior of the parties. InBurgess V. Rawnsley[ 12 ] , the claimant and the suspect bought a belongings and each contributed every bit towards the purchase monetary value. The claimant claimed that the belongings was bought as a household house since he had purported to suggest matrimony to the suspect. The suspect was minded to populate in the upstairs flat and the claimant ever lived in the downstairs. It was besides accepted in grounds that the suspect had antecedently agreed to sell her portion of the belongings to the claimant which she later refused. On decease of the suspect, the complainant claimed as the subsister of joint occupancy. The tribunal held that there was no common intent and there was a resulting trust in favor of defendant’s personal representatives. Course of covering sufficient to adumbrate that the involvements of all were reciprocally treated as representing a occupancy in common. InBurgess V. Rawnsley[ 13 ] , the tribunal besides held that negotiations which, although non otherwise ensuing in any understanding, indicate a common purpose that the joint occupancy should be regarded as severed [ 14 ] Forfeit. This is where one of the joint renters engages in dangerous offense. For case where lasting renter kills the other renter. The rule is that offenders must non profit from their incorrect. InDunbar V Plant[ 15 ] , here, the plaintiff’s boy and the suspect had planned to acquire married and when there was allegation of fraud against one of the twosome, they planned joint self-destruction. The suspect survived and her lover died. The tribunal held that the suspect had aided, abetted and counselled the deceased’s self-destruction and as such the forfeiture regulation applied to break up the joint occupancy. InCarr and others V. Isard and another[ 16 ] , the first claimant was the senior girl of T and G. The first suspect was the girl of the younger girl of T and G. T and G bought a belongings as joint renter. Both T and G made volitions made by the same house of canvassers in 1967 but there was no grounds that they were both cognizant of the fact that the other party made a will. The term of G’s will was that the belongings should travel to T for life and balance to the first defendant’s female parent and if she predeceased G to the 2nd claimant. Thymine by his will bequest to G for life and the balance to first defendant’s female parent and if she predeceases G, to the first suspect. T died go forthing a will dated 23 November 1977 well the same as the 1967 will. G dies in 2000 go forthing a will dated 26 January 1996 different in footings as the 1967 will. The tribunal held that there is no grounds that T and G communicated their purpose to break up the joint occupancy. Consequently, the term of the 1967 will does non so break up the joint occupancy. The purpose to break up the will must be ambiguous from the act of the parties and they must hold been cognizant of the Acts of the Apostless break uping the joint occupancy. Making a will without the other party’s cognition is non plenty to break up joint occupancy. Therefore, unless Teresa severed the joint occupancy by notice or understanding, temperaments of her portion in Blueacre every bit between the kids has no consequence. John has right to survivorship in Blueacre . However, if John and Teresa had visited the canvasser together to do Teresa’s will and John had cognition that she disposed of Blueacre in mode incompatible with joint occupancy. Therefore, the joint occupancy would severe by mutualness of understanding. The fact the John’s consciousness of the mutual exclusiveness is overriding. This means that Teresa’s temperament in her will must be given consequence to and her involvement in Blueacre would travel to her donees. The same decision will avail if they both made volitions incompatible with a joint occupancy and they are both cognizant of the fact of the mutual exclusiveness. The fact in this scenario will be the same with that inWoolnough, Re, Perkins V Borden[ 17 ] , Len and Emmy owned belongings as joint renters. They both went to solicitor fain of the belongings by will. The issue before the tribunal was whether or non the joint renter had been severed. The tribunal held that the devising of two volitions is inconsistent with the continuation of the joint occupancy. Bibliography Cases: Bull V. Bull ( 1955 ) 1 QB 234 Burgess V. Rawnsley ( 1975 ) 1 Ch 429 Carr and others V. Isard and another ( 2006 ) ALL ER ( D ) 343 Dunbar V Plant ( 1989 ) FLR 157 First National Securities V. Hegarty ( 1984 ) 1 ALL ER 139 Heathe V. Heathe ( 1740 ) 2 Atk 121 Lashbrook V. Cock ( 1816 ) 2 Mer 70 Lewen V. Dodd ( 1595 ) Cro Eliz 443 Peat V. Chapman ( 1750 ) 1 Ves Sen 542 Woolnough, Re, Perkins V Borden ( 2002 ) WTLR 595 Legislative acts: Law of Property Act 1925 Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act ( TOLATA ) 1996 Textbooks: Barlow, King A ; King, Wills, Administration and revenue enhancement: A practical Guide Sweet A ; Maxwell 8ThursdayEdition Judith-Anne Mackenzie A ; Mary Phillips, Textbook on Land Law, Oxford University Press 12ThursdayEdition.

Capital Punishment11 essays

Capital Punishment11 essays ?The?Capital punishment is the infliction of the death penalty on persons convicted of a crime.? This has been a topic of debate for many years. ?Why do we kill people to prove killing people is wrong The 1st argument I have against capital punishment is that it's unconstitutional. Every person has an equal right tolife, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.? This is a quote from American Civil Liberty Union National Office,Capital punishment is a barbaric remnant of an uncivilized society. It is immoral in principle, and unfair and discriminatory in practice.? Does the government have the right to kill? Maybe in self defense, like a policeman firing on a armed and dangerous criminal. Suppose we apply the same standards to the government that we have for civilians. A civilian has the right to shoot at an intruder as he is entering his home but if the civilian catches the intruder and has him under his control, the shooting him would be considered murder. That's what capital punishment is...simple murder. Against: I agree that capital punishment is a relic of barbarism but as murder itself is barbaric, death is a fitting punishment for it. It goes along with the ?eye for an eye? principle. For example, someone steals $10 from you and then the person who stole your money has the same thing happen to them? Doesn't that satisfy you? Many feel the same about murders who are sentence to die. The criminal has brought the punishment upon himself, they The 8th amendment of the us constitution, condemn gruel and unusual punishment is used to protest capital punishment. For:: When the constitution was drafted, capital punishment was practiced widely in this country, yet it was not specified as wrong or as cruel and unusual. John Locke went as far to say that murder is ...

Case-Training for Excellence at Wegman Food Market

Case-Training For Excellence At Wegman Food Market Case: Training for Excellence at Wegman Food Market Wegmans Food Markets, â€Å"a regional supermarket chain based in Rochester, New York, is one of the top 75 U. S. supermarkets in terms of sales volume and is widely respected in the industry. Observers agree that training is a big reason why the company stands out,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 209). In this paper I will discuss how training at Wegmans’ is related to its organizational needs and how Wegmans’ measure the success of their training programs. I will also discuss if an e-learning will be an appropriate training method at Wegman and for what aspect of training might it be most beneficial? I will discuss how on-going training for employees can have a positive impact on employee retention Discuss how training at Wegmans’ is related to its organizational needs. â€Å"Hiring the right people means more than just securing employees who possess the knowledge, skills, and abilities required to perform a particular job; these people must also be able to acquire new knowledge and skills as jobs and environments change,†(Dreher Dougherty, 2001, p. ). Wegman Food Market Human Resources department have to ensure that they are hiring the right people that will provide the customers with superior customer service and commit to implementing the knowledge they receive during training. Wegmans organizational strategy is for the employees to â€Å"understand sales and competing on the basis of quality and service,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 209). Wegman Food Market uses hands on training throughout their stores, to provide the employees with an opportunity to experience making the products themselves. Training content includes practical matters such as product knowledge, food safety, and the ways to cook and bake,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 209) fits the organizational needs of the Wegman Food Markets. According to the case, how does Wegmans’ measure the success of its training? Increased sales and customer satisfaction reviews are ways that Wegman Food Market executives can mea sure the success of company training. â€Å"Wegmans measures the success of its training based on whether a store’s sales are growing. In fact, sales and profit growth are primary ways the company measures the performance of the company’s director of training and development,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 209). Wegman Food Market employees’ new positive attitude towards doing their job and providing the best customer service are also ways that executives can measure success of company training. â€Å"Assessment of training also should evaluate training outcomes, such as change in attitude, ability to perform a new skill, and recall of facts or behaviors taught in the training program,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 07). Do you think e-learning might be an appropriate training method at Wegmans? Why or Why not? For what aspect of training might it be most beneficial? E-learning â€Å"involves receiving training via the Internet or the organization’s intranet, typically through some combination of Web-based training modules, distance learning, and virtual classrooms,† (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 192). E-learning â€Å"content may be delivered via the internet, intranet/extranet, audio or video tape, CD-ROM and satellite TV,† (SHRM, 2008, p. ). Wegman Food Market could benefit from implementing an e-learning training method in their stores. The Human Resource department can use the training tool to train new and old employees that may have missed a previous training session due to a scheduling issue. The employees would be able to train on their own time or refresh their knowledge about preparing a particular product without having to ask another employee or supervisor. The employees will be able to assist the customers with confidence and enthusiasm. The e-learning system may also process enrollments, test and evaluate participants, and monitor progress,† (Noe, Hollenback, Gerhart Wright, 2009, p. 192). This training system can help the Human Resource department keep track of all the employees tra ining. They will be able to see which employee’s needs to be trained and which employees passed or failed any training sessions. Implementing an e-learning system at Wegman would reduce the cost of traveling to training locations and the cost of bringing in training coaches from different companies. Discuss how on-going training for employees can have a positive impact on employee retention. Knowledge and skill acquisition will not lead to improved firm performance unless employees are allowed and encouraged to use job–related knowledge and skills when performing their jobs,† (Dreher Dougherty, 2001, p. 7). In order for Wegman Food Market to reduce retention rates, they will need to develop new training programs and make improvements continuously. Training should be offered to Wegman employees annually or quarterly to ensure that they are learning new techniques and different recipes to teach to the customers. â€Å"Effective initial and ongoing training can ge t employees engaged in their work. New employees that are given thorough orientation and training can take their new skills and start performing in their new role with confidence. On going training demonstrates that the organization values the employee in their current role as well as their potential for future personal development,† (Loyaltyworks, 2010). On going training at Wegman Food Market will lead to increased morale and a sense of achievement from the employees. Employees will feel appreciated for their work and want to help the company succeed in reaching any company goals and providing the best customer service to Wegman customers. When employees job satisfaction rates are up, the employees will be less likely to leave the company. In this paper I have discussed how training at Wegmans’ is related to its organizational needs and how Wegmans’ measures the success of their training programs. I have also discussed that e-learning will be an appropriate training method implemented at Wegmans’ and what aspect of training it will be most beneficial. I have also discussed how on-going training for employees can have a positive impact on employee retention rates. Dreher Daugherty. (2001). Human Resources Strategy: Understanding Behavior in Organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill Loyaltyworks. (2010). The 8 Drivers of Employee Satisfaction and Engagement. Retrieved on October 27, 2010 from http://hubpages. com/hub/The-8-Drivers-of-Employee-Satisfaction-and-Engagement Noe, R. A. , Hollenbeck, J. R. , Gerhart, B. , Wright, P. M. (2009). Fundamentals of Human Resource Management (3rd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill SHRM. (2010). Introduction to the Discipline of Human Resources Technology. Retrieved on October 29, 2010 from http://www. shrm. org/hrdisciplines/technology/Pages/TechnologyIntro. aspx

International Relations Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2

International Relations - Essay Example We may often wonder why some nations cooperate with each other while other nations go to war. The answer lies in analysis and the application of theories of political science and international relations. In this manner, theory can guide in the analysis and application of a basis for explaining current scenarios and unfolding realities. The present political scenario in Egypt and other parts of the Middle East is rather fluid and in a state of flux. As long established autocratic regimes break up and expose the cruel games of their despotic rulers, the era of the political strongman seems to be at a close. Saddam has already met his end. America cannot afford to look the other way any longer. The time is right for change and the writing is on the wall for Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Jordan, Libya and a slew of other Axis of Evil nations that seek to perpetuate their regimes through suppression of dissent and oppression of the native people, many of whom do not even know their political rig hts- and are much less allowed to express their true feelings. Change took thirty years to come about in Egypt, but the people paid the price for their freedom. The Structural Theorist Perspective & Core Assumptions Supporters of the structural theorist perspective are of the view that changes and political upheaval is brought on by the structures or institutions that are in place in a particular region. A structural theorist like Mary would seek to explain the recent changes in Egypt by using as her basis of argument characteristics associated with the system. She would be inclined to discount the value of state players. The structural theorist believes that the inherent nature of the international system is hierarchical or anarchical. Power distribution between states might be uni-polar, bi-polar or multi-polar. The system structure determines the goal of states whether it is security or wealth accumulation. At any given time there is a certain degree of uncertainty surrounding re lations between states. Comments about what should happen in Egypt now have come from Barrack Obama of the USA, David Cameron of the UK (he even made a visit to Egypt after Mubarak’s ouster and mingled with people at Tahrir Square after talking to the key general of the Armed Forces to bring about a change according to people’s expectations) and Germany’s Angela Merkel- so clearly these G20 leaders are keenly interested in Egypt’s fortunes and its implications for the future international relations and policy. The Social Theorist Perspective & Core Assumptions Supporters of the social theorist perspective are of the view that changes and political upheaval is brought on by the different classes of society or institutions that are in place in a particular region. A social theorist like Tom would point out to the rot in the system initiated and maintained by Hosni Mubarak for thirty years- and the creation of different classes of people in society that foug ht each other as they vied for power, wealth and prosperity. So here we would have the grounds for debate between the structural theorist and the social theorist. Mary would point out that the final impetus for change was pushed through by comments from Obama, Cameron and other world leaders. It was only

The rise of the modern Civil Rights movement Essay

The rise of the modern Civil Rights movement - Essay Example Rise of the modern civil rights movements Major players in the modern civil rights movements Faced with racial discrimination, social prejudice and poor service provisions, the minority groups realized that they had to fight for their legitimate rights. Studies by McWhorter2 showed that religious leaders, influential businesspersons, and early African American scholars pioneered the modern civil rights movements. Some of the most notable individuals who spearheaded the movements included the following, Thurgood Marshall, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, and James Meredith. Thurgood Marshall was the first black Supreme Court justice, who prior to his appointment was the attorney of the civil rights groups NAACP. Martin Luther Jr. being the most influential figure in the civil rights movement was among the founders of summer Christian leadership conference, which organized civil disobedience movements across the nation. Along with Luther in the struggle for civil rights was a lso Malcolm X popularly known as the Black Nationalist and the founder of organization of the Afro American Unity. The main events that shape the modern civil rights movement The efforts of the modern civil rights movements culminated to the legislature of new laws and amendment of racial discriminating laws that had been passed by the past administrations. In 1948, President Truman signed the executive order 9981, which provided for equality of treatment and opportunity for all in the armed forces. Six years later, the ruling by supreme in 1954 abolished segregation in public schools and termed it unconstitutional. Because of the 1954 ruling, James Meredith became the first black person to enrol at the University of Mississippi. In 1963 Martin Luther lead the famous march on Washington which congregated at the Lincoln memorial, where Martin delivered the â€Å"I have a Dream â€Å"speech. In his book, Dierenfiled3, wrote that in keeping his promise of the great society, President Johnson signed the civil Rights Act of 1964, which led to prohibition of any form of discrimination, based on race, color, or religion. According to Pitney,4 the President also signed the most documented act of 1965, the Voting Rights Act, which had been passed by the congress. The act abolished the requirements for literacy test and poll taxes making the voting much easier for the African Americans. In addition, Immigration and National Services Act was also passed in the same year, allowing for citizens from other nations apart from the European nation into the U.S. With the recognition of universal equality for all persons without regards to race or gender, the Supreme Court in 1967 passed a ruling that declared the prohibition of interracial marriage unconstitutional. Another notable event in the timeline of civil rights movement was the Los Angeles riots of 1992, which occurred after a court jury, acquitted four white police officers who were videotaped beating Rodney King. Ot her groups that fought for equality in the 1950s Apart from the civil rights movements that championed for the rights of the African Americans, there were also other civil groups fighting for people with disabilities and workers welfare. In his book Caro5, observed that those living with disabilities also faced the similar challenges to some extent that the African Ameri

Pride And Prejudice - Point Of View Essay -- essays research papers

Marry For Love The point of view of a novel usually decides which characters we sympathize with. In the novel Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, Elizabeth Bennett is the focal character, which causes the reader to feel closest to her. The reader can relate more easily to her feelings and actions, and given that all of Elizabeth’s opinions on large issues are known and understood, the reader tends to side with her. By making the story from the point of view of Elizabeth, Austen is able to take advantage of the closeness between reader and character to make a political statement about the institution of marriage, and thus shows her own feeling that it is a mistake to marry for any other reason besides love. One way that she shows her feelings on matrimony is by using Elizabeth’s voice as her own to approve of some characters decisions about marriage. Elizabeth’s approval of certain characters shows Austen’s approval, and in this case, Elizabeth approves of the marriage between Jane and Bingley. Jane and Bingley show throughout the novel their genuine affection for one another, and Elizabeth observes about Bingley’s affection for Jane, "I never saw a more promising inclination. He was growing quite inattentive to other people, and wholly engrossed by her†¦ Is not general incivility the very essence of love?" (106). Mrs. Bennett approves of the match mostly on a monetary basis, and exclaims, "Why, he has four or five thousand a year, and very likely more. Oh my dear Jane, I am so happy!" (260). Elizabeth, however, looks down on her mother for this, and approves of the marriage because she can tell that the two are truly in love with one another. Austen also makes those in love the happiest of all the characters. Jane and Bingley are truly in love, consequently, they are two of the happiest characters in the novel. Jane announces that, "’Tis too much! By far too much. I do not deserve it. Oh! why is not everybody as happy?" (259) and, "I am certainly the most fortunate creature that ever existed!" (262). Jane and Bingley’s happiness shows the author’s approval of their marriage. Austen uses Elizabeth’s voice as her own to make the statement that love is the only acceptable reason to marry. Another way that Austen uses Elizabeth to show her feelings on the issue of matrimony is b... ...iven to Wickham by Darcy, they are the ones in the worst financial situation. "They were always moving from place to place in quest of a cheap situation, and always spending more than they ought" (290-291). By using Elizabeth as the character from whose point of view we see the other characters, we are shown by Austen how to feel about each specific situation. In the case of Lydia and Wickham, we are to agree with Elizabeth (and thus Austen) that they have gotten what they deserve for jumping into marriage for the wrong reasons. Therefore, Austen’s voice comes through Elizabeth to make the statement that it is foolish to marry for any reason besides love. Jane Austen uses Elizabeth as the focal character in the novel Pride and Prejudice to relay a message to the reader. Her own voice comes through Elizabeth to make the political statement that it is unwise to marry for any reason other than love. Elizabeth (and thus Austen) feels that true happiness cannot be achieved in a marriage unless there is a great deal of love between the partners, and so explains her pursuit for true love, and her disapproval of marriage between those she knows are not in love.

Evacuee By R.S Thomas & Disabled By Wilfred Owen Essay

In this report I will be comparing and contrasting two poets from two different styles of life and cultural traditions. I will compare differences and similarities of how they deal with casualties of war. The first poet is R.S.Thomas. The poem that i have chosen is called evacuee, it is about a young girl who was born and grew up in a large city maybe London. She is evacuated to the Welsh countryside during the Second World War. She has no parents or family when she leaves and she is accepted into a farming family. She grows up and it shows that she has no plans of returning to the city. This poem is about the healing power of nature and someone who is saved from the disastrous effects of war. The second poet is Wilfred Owen. The poem is called Disabled and it is about a young man who is a football player, an athletic man, he has a girlfriend and he enjoys going out and drinking. He comes out of the pub one evening and he sees a military sign up and he is attracted to the salutes, marches, uniforms, etc. So he signs himself up. He is sent home from the war having lost his arms and his legs. He lives the rest of his life in a â€Å"Wheeled Chair†. These two poets come from very different backgrounds and in this report i will compare and contrast those backgrounds. Wilfred Edward Salter Owen was born on the 18th March 1893. He was an English poet and soldier. His poems described the shocking and realistic horrors of the trench and gas warfare. He was killed in action at the Sambre-Oise Canal a week before the war ended. Owen had four brothers and sisters and was born in Oswestry in Shropshire. When his grandfather died in 1897 the family was forced to move to lodgings in Birkenhead. He was raised as an Anglican of the evangelical school. His early influences were John Keats and the Bible. In 1915 he enlisted in the Artists Rifles. In 1917 he was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Manchester regiment. Owen was diagnosed as suffering from shell shock and sent to Craiglockhart for treatment. Whilst there he met Siegfried Sassoon another poet. Owen nearly worshiped Sassoon as a hero saying that he was not worthy to light his pipe. Ronald Stuart Thomas was born on the 29th March 1913. He was a Welsh poet and an Anglican Clergyman he was known for his nationalism and spirituality. He was born in Cardiff in Wales. The family moved to Holyhead in 1918 because of his fathers work. He was ordained a priest in the Anglican Church in Wales in 1936. He married Mildred Eldridge in 1940 and they stayed together until she died in 1991 apparently they never spoke to each other and never touched each other. They had one son named Gwydion. Thomas was a supporter of CND (Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament). He died on the 25th September 2000 at the age of 87. The poets have many differences and not so many similarities. The differences are that Wilfred Owen seems to stay away from religion in his poems and even shows detest in the poem disabled. While R.S. Thomas was a Clergyman and was widely known for his spirituality. Owen was born in a town near Birmingham called Shropshire. Thomas was born in Cardiff in Wales. Owen was a soldier and knew first hand about the horrors of war, what it was like living in the trench, and all the dangers of it, like trench-foot or gang green. While Thomas did not know anything about war apart from what he may have read from books. In my considered opinion i think that if the two poets had met each other they would not have been best friends for they were very different to each other. Owen did not like religion or priests when Thomas was a Clergyman. The two poems, The Evacuee & Disabled, also have many differences and similarities. Disabled is in the 1st person and is more immediate while The Evacuee is in the 3rd person and is a lot slower in pace. The Evacuee has a religious feel while Disabled has an anti-religious feel. The Evacuee has the feeling of nature being personified as a healer and the city is being personified as a destroyer and killer in the case of Disabled. â€Å"He sat in a Wheeled Chair† this tells us that he has no arms because it is not a wheel chair but a wheeled chair because he can not wheel it himself, someone else has to. His life is in the hands of the nurse, he has no control over what happens in his life and he will never for the rest of his life. While the evacuee has been given a new lease of life after being sent to the welsh countryside because if she had stayed in the city she could have lived for one week or two but eventually she would have been caught by the bombings that went on every night or she would eventually get locked out during an air raid and probably shot dead where she stood. Living in a big city during the Second World War, even any war, would have been terrible. Not being able to go out after dark, having to live in complete poverty, never knowing if the next death would be you or not. When an evacuee child is moved out of the city a large amount of them go to good homes where they can live there for free and not have to work and where they would get three meals a day but some evacuees would be moved to bad families that would become slave drivers and force the children that they took in to work on their farms until they dropped down dead. This was not legal at the time but because of the situation not many questions were posted at farming towns or families. There also was a large threat of gas attacks all the time which is why every single house in London had at least two gas masks. Thomas would most likely have grown up around farming families and his family may have even took in an evacuee at one time so it is more likely that he knew more about evacuees then Owen did and vice versa that Owen would have know more about casualties of war from experience then all the knowledge that Thomas would have read. In my opinion to actually experience something like fighting in war is more knowledgeable then reading every book in the world about war. If the evacuee girl had stayed in London she would most probably have died like her family may have. The poem Disabled is about a young man who goes to war and returns with no legs and no arms. He sits at the window every day watching children playing football in the park, young couples walking along the road, and at night he hears and sees the young men and women coming out of pubs and clubs enjoying themselves. He knows he will never be able to kick a ball again, he will never put his arm around a woman again, and he will most likely never be able to drink alcohol again because of medication he may be on. His life is over before it has even truly begun and he knows it. Day in and day out he is woken up by a nurse and put into his chair and left, he is ignored all day no woman will want to talk to him again and he will not have any young recruits coming to him asking for tips about keeping their rifles clean and polished nor will he ever receive even the smallest medal. He will probably only get his name written on a memorial of all the soldiers but nothing that he can say to someone â€Å"Yes I earned that and i am proud of my choices when i was younger†. He will regret the day he signed himself up for the army for the rest of his life and it could be long. Throughout the both the poems there is a lot of figurative language used. In Disabled there is an image created in the fourth stanza where the man describes what he is attracted to in joining the army. â€Å"He thought of jeweled hilts for daggers in Plaid socks; of smart salutes; and care of arms; and leave; and pay arrears; Esprit de corps; and hints for young recruits.† He saw the jeweled hilts of the ceremonial swords that the soldiers had and he thought of himself with one and he saw the salutes to commanding officers and he liked this also. He wanted to get his hands on a gun and he thought of Esprit de corps. Esprit de corps is fighting along side soldiers, making friend, he thought joining the army would be like joining a football team or going away to camp. He had no fears of Germans. He had no real fears at all, all he knew was that he was going to wear a smart suit and be able to have a gun and he did not think about killing enemies or even being killed. This creates an image for us as you can see him staggering out of a pub and seeing some soldiers at a stand holding a pen and paper. You can see the expression on his face as he thinks about all the things he would receive from joining the army. The Evacuee is all about personification of nature; Thomas personifies nature to be a healer and a protector. He is saying that this girl who came from nothing, she was nearly dead, has been given new life by nature she has been healed. If there was pictures to go with this poem, I think that at the beginning it would show the girl very thin and sick looking and pale and near the end there would be another picture of her but it would look like a completely different person. Thomas is a strong believer in God and nature as a healer. He probably believed that this girl came from the city near death and with the power of nature with the fresh air, the grass, and the peace it helped her to grow strong and she probably became a believer herself. The poem Disabled is more superior because it shows a realistic story of the devastating effects of war and its consequences on the human body. Wilfred Owens poems are very graphical and detailed he does not believe in an easy way to describe war. He just goes straight in and says exactly what it is like. Whereas R.S.Thomas is a religious person so he probably does not like anything to do with war and he probably believes that anyone can be saved no matter how bad their wounds are, mentally or physically, through prayer to God. In my opinion the disabled man could not be healed. He could move to the countryside and he might be happier but it is not going to make his legs grow back. The poem The Evacuee is more superior because it shows how anyone can be healed by nature and how anyone can be saved from war. Thomas believes in nature and its powers, he believes that the evacuee girl is just an example of a casualty of war that has been saved. He has shown in his poem that nature and God combined together are unbeatable in the way that they can heal mental problems and maybe not physical ones like the disabled man but they could be made happier because living in a hospital for the rest of his life it would not be healthy for him. However if he had been given the chance to live in the countryside he could see nature for what it is. In my opinion both poems are equally superior in the way that they both describe casualties of war and both in their own way put in all the needed detail.